[Case Study of Micro Separator Introduction] Labor-saving Management of Water Glycol in Casting Machines

Added to bookmarks
Bookmarks list

Bookmark has been removed
Bookmarks list

You can't add any more bookmarks

By registering as a member, you can increase the number of bookmarks you can save and organize them with labels.
Free membership registration

last updated：Jan 22, 2020

サンエス工業

After the installation of the microseparator, issues related to the properties of the water-glycol operating fluid are gradually being resolved!

We are using water-glycol hydraulic fluid, and issues have arisen due to its characteristics; however, I report that these are gradually being resolved after the installation of the microseparator. To confirm the effectiveness, we conducted a monitoring of the hydraulic fluid, comparing machines with and without the microseparator over a six-month follow-up period. When comparing the condition of the oil after six months through microscopic observation, machine A, which does not have the microseparator installed, showed floating contaminants (scum) specific to water-glycol and foreign contaminants, indicating a high level of contamination and unstable oil properties. In contrast, machine B, which has the microseparator installed, demonstrated its effectiveness, maintaining a low level of contamination and a stable condition. [Case Summary] ■ User: Company H (automotive parts manufacturer) ■ Machine: Cylinder head casting machine ■ Tank: 400L ■ Pump: (approximately 80L/min) ■ Products used: 5 units of MSR-200 type ■ Oil used: Swafluid HQ (water-glycol) *For more details, please refer to the PDF document or feel free to contact us.