[MIM Manufacturing Method Case Study] Automotive Parts

20% cost reduction! Provides benefits such as no PL step at the joint and no deformation due to joining pressure.

Here is an example of adopting the "MIM manufacturing method" in automotive parts. The challenges before adoption included the occurrence of PL step differences at the joints, deformation of hollow parts due to joining pressure, and high costs associated with the joining process of composite parts. It was adopted for reasons of reducing costs by 20% and improving productivity by 30%. This method offers advantages such as no PL step differences at the joints, no deformation due to joining pressure, cost reduction through integration, and mass production capabilities. [Case Overview (Partial)] ■ Processing Technology Name: MIM Manufacturing Method ■ Technology Overview: Hollow MIM Manufacturing Method ■ Adopted Product: Automotive Parts ■ Reason for Adoption: 20% cost reduction, 30% productivity improvement *For more details, please refer to the related links or feel free to contact us.

Processing Contract