[Philosophy of Design] Are you compromising with only the shapes that can be made? Reclaiming the "dignity of design" that is being lost in the name of efficiency.
T3Japan
[Design Philosophy] Are you compromising with only "shapes that can be made"?
In modern manufacturing, "efficiency" is the supreme proposition. However, in the pursuit of creating data in the shortest time possible, are we not discarding the "dignity of design" that should inherently exist?
Many of you may have experienced being rejected by CAD while trying to pursue freeform surfaces, reluctantly compromising with combinations of straight lines. In essence, design is not about creating shapes that are easy to draw with CAD commands; it is about materializing the "thought" that engineers have embedded.
In this technical column, we explained the concept of "GSM (Global Shape Modeling)" that we have been refining for many years, focusing on how to reclaim the "sovereignty of design" that designers have been on the verge of losing.
If you are seeking a new way of design that breaks free from "design dominated by tools" and does not limit creativity, please take a moment to read this.
▼ Read the full article here
https://zenn.dev/t3japan/articles/16cd23736d2868

Inquiry about this news
Contact Us OnlineMore Details & Registration
Details & Registration
Related Links
Nice to meet you, I'm Takachan, working in sales (which is more like a pre-sales role) at ThinkDesign. Usually, I listen to clients' desires for "the kind of service they want to create" and act as a bridge to turn those into a "concrete blueprint" that engineers and designers can easily realize.




