Disparate sites for each location disrupt trust and navigation. By integrating information from multiple locations, we maximize branded searches and inquiries.
Manufacturers with multiple locations and diverse businesses tend to have a structure that makes the web easily "fragmented." Each location has a separate site, information is duplicated, and the quality of updates is inconsistent. As a result, even if you search, you may find yourself in a situation where "it's unclear which is the official site," "you can't reach the necessary information," or "it's confusing to find the contact point," leading to missed opportunities. Furthermore, when recruitment, investor relations, technical information, and service information are scattered, the company's consistent strengths are not communicated, putting it at a disadvantage in comparisons. This service not only integrates information from multiple locations but also starts by organizing business × location × sales pathways, consolidating search inflow, navigation, decision-making, and inquiries into a single structure. It includes operational design that allows each location to update even after integration, reconstructing the site to withstand long-term operation. ■ Provided Content (3 points) Integration policy and governance design (how to hold information/authority/update rules) Information design (integrated site map) (organization of locations and businesses/navigation design) Production and migration (design/implementation/content migration/publication) Deliverables: Complete set of integrated renewal (integration design document, site map, wireframes, design, implementation, migration, publication) *Please share the current list of location sites (URLs). We will address the "pitfalls" of integration in advance and propose the shortest route.
Inquire About This Product
basic information
■Provided Content Integration Policy Design (Foundation for Decision-Making) - Integration Patterns: 1. Complete Integration (1 Domain) 2. Integration + Subsite (Authority Separation) 3. Integrated Portal + Existing Maintenance (Phased Integration) - Definition of Official Information (Which is Correct) and Clarification of Update Responsibilities Information Design (Site × Business × User Flow) - Organize sites around the corporate structure (business) as "Supply/Response Scope" - Standardize Products and Services with Common DB/Common Template - Inquiry Flow: Company-wide Contact Point + Site Distribution (Branching by Conditions) Migration Design (Key to SEO and Operations) - URL Design, 301 Redirects, Duplicate Management - Content Inventory (Keep/Integrate/Discard) - Procedures for Integrating Without Losing Search Ranking Operational Design (Preventing Collapse After Integration) - Authority: Role Distribution among Headquarters/Sites/Departments - Guidelines: Templates, Notation, Approval Flow - Update System: Operations that Do Not Become Person-dependent
Price information
6 million yen to 20 million yen (varies greatly based on the number of locations, number of pages, volume of migration, and features) - Small-scale integration (up to 3 locations / few migrations): 6 to 9 million yen - Standard integration (5 to 10 locations / including migration and governance): 9 to 14 million yen - Large-scale integration (10 locations or more / database, permissions, multilingual, etc.): 14 million yen and up * "Estimate required" notation recommended (to be confirmed through current situation investigation)
Delivery Time
※Minimum 4 months - Standard 6 to 10 months (subject to change based on consensus formation at the base)
Applications/Examples of results
■Concerns Multiple locations and business sites are proliferating, causing confusion for customers. Information is duplicated, updates are not being made, and outdated information remains. Contact points are unclear, leading to missed opportunities. SEO is dispersed, making it weak in searches (even losing out on branded searches). There is a desire to integrate, but progress is hindered by local circumstances (governance is needed). ■Approach Pre-sharing: List of location sites/issues/constraints for integration (internal circumstances). Integration diagnosis: Inventory of issues related to information, SEO, user pathways, and operations. Design: Integration policy → sitemap → URL/migration → wireframe → design → implementation plan. Production and migration: Staged publication is possible (starting from priority locations). Post-publication: Establishing operations and improvements (monthly support is optional). ■Purpose Elimination of information fragmentation (unification of official status and trust). Integration of SEO evaluation (maximizing search traffic). Integration of inquiry pathways (to avoid confusion). Standardization of update operations (to ensure consistent quality). ■Examples of Achievements (company name not required format) Multiple locations processing × 200 employees × site proliferation → Resolved confusion over contact points through integrated pathways. Industrial equipment × 500 employees × dispersed SEO → Maintained evaluation through URL migration design and integration. Chemical materials × 1,000 employees × inconsistent update quality → Established operations through authority/guideline improvements.
Company information
A site that is just cheap ultimately increases costs and risks." We propose web development that maximizes business results while thoroughly addressing essential requirements. Are you creating a website like this? - It seems that the websites of competitors look better, but you don't know why. - Every update incurs additional costs, and before you know it, expenses have ballooned beyond expectations. - While the appearance is nice, it ignores laws and industry-specific rules, leading to complaint risks... - You want to attract customers and inquiries, but the production company only talks about design. - As a result of choosing a production that is simply cheap, you are overwhelmed with trouble handling and can't focus on your core business. Point 1. Avoid troubles with a design that has no "gaps or omissions." 2. Minimize operational costs with a design that assumes in-house updates. 3. Planning power that pursues business results. "Is the initial cost a bit high?" But in the long run, it's safe and cost-effective. We have prepared a plan to truly deliver results "correctly.
![[Leveling Correction] Leveling correction of concrete floors "Teratec Method"](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/product/image/d08/1267539002/IPROS70063422645318547243.jpeg?w=280&h=280)
![[Case Study] Construction Example of High-Temperature Facilities in Factories Using High-Performance Heat Insulation Sheets](https://image.mono.ipros.com/public/product/image/962/2000579577/IPROS04218491152233419232.jpeg?w=280&h=280)
