Even when summarized by AI, it remains a structure that is a "strong candidate" for selection. We will establish a format that accurately conveys expertise and reliability.
The reason why "the expertise and implementation system of clinical trials are not reflected in AI" is due to a "structural deficiency" where AI cannot read the basis of trust. With the spread of AI search, clients narrow down candidates by asking AI about "specific areas and implementation speed" without thorough reading. Websites where achievements and facilities are confined to images and PDFs are ignored by AI, even if they have an excellent system, and fall out of the comparison arena. This service redesigns the structure to convey information to both AI and humans, based on the selection criteria of the clinical trial industry. It determines "which achievements and numbers to showcase to be chosen" and supports the renewal. 【Usage Scenarios】 - Visualization of the system: Create a structure that allows AI to accurately reference implementation areas and case achievements. - Building the basis of trust: Make SOPs and quality management systems recognized by AI as "strengths." - Optimization for stakeholders: Redefine pathways for pharmaceutical companies, medical institutions, and subjects. 【Effects of Implementation】 - Search superiority: It will be cited as a "highly reliable partner" in AI recommendation lists. - Smoothening of business negotiations: Mismatches due to deficiencies in specialized information will decrease, improving the quality of proposals. - Assetization of information: Obtain a strong customer acquisition asset that AI continues to evaluate as an "official information source."
Inquire About This Product
basic information
【Features】 - Organization of business, products, and customers (winning strategies/selection criteria/objection handling points) - Redesign of information structure and navigation (sitemap/page roles/user flow/CTA) - Creation of key page outlines (heading structure/persuasive axes/FAQ/case study placement) - Translation of sales realities: who makes decisions/what causes hesitation/reasons for lost deals/how strengths are communicated - Structural redesign: defining page roles and designing navigation (entry → deep dive → comparison → consultation) - Content design: standardizing selection criteria, usage, implementation conditions, FAQs, and case study presentation - Organization based on AI reference: heading structure, definition sentences, summary resilience, and organization of duplication and dispersion 【Our Strengths】 "A site that is just cheap ultimately increases costs and risks." While thoroughly addressing basic requirements, we propose web production that maximizes business outcomes.
Price information
Light: 300,000 yen (Current situation analysis + overall policy + focus on Quick Wins) Standard: 600,000 yen (To-Be structure + sitemap + main page outline) Expanded: 1,000,000 yen and up (many product groups / competitive comparison / integration of multiple businesses, etc.) *Can be changed to require a quotation.
Delivery Time
※Minimum 2 weeks - Standard 3 to 5 weeks (depending on the scale)
Applications/Examples of results
■Concerns like these - The company's "case results and areas of expertise" are ignored in AI responses, treating them similarly to competitors. - High reliability and ethical considerations are not becoming "searchable terms" for AI or new customers. - While there are downloads of materials and inquiries, there are many mismatches in implementation conditions and scale, leading to no contracts. - Considering a renewal, but unsure how to organize legal regulations and specialized information to be "chosen." - The "weight of achievements" spoken by sales is not reflected on the web, causing a lag behind competitors digitally. ■Purpose Establishing a "winning model" before renewal. Rebuilding the structure to address the causes of decreased inquiries. Designing the starting point for mass production of product pages and material download pathways. Redesigning to integrate divisions in sales, web, recruitment, etc. ■Examples of achievements (confidentiality consideration format) Industrial equipment × 200 employees × lost orders due to comparison × selection criteria for product pages + FAQ redesign + pathway refresh. Precision processing × 80 employees × decrease in inquiries × top definition statement + case placement + material download → redesign of consultation pathway. Chemical materials × 500 employees × fragmentation across multiple businesses × structural design for site integration + redefinition of page roles.
catalog（20）
Download All Catalogs
Company information
A site that is just cheap ultimately increases costs and risks." We propose web development that maximizes business results while thoroughly addressing essential requirements. Are you creating a website like this? - It seems that the websites of competitors look better, but you don't know why. - Every update incurs additional costs, and before you know it, expenses have ballooned beyond expectations. - While the appearance is nice, it ignores laws and industry-specific rules, leading to complaint risks... - You want to attract customers and inquiries, but the production company only talks about design. - As a result of choosing a production that is simply cheap, you are overwhelmed with trouble handling and can't focus on your core business. Point 1. Avoid troubles with a design that has no "gaps or omissions." 2. Minimize operational costs with a design that assumes in-house updates. 3. Planning power that pursues business results. "Is the initial cost a bit high?" But in the long run, it's safe and cost-effective. We have prepared a plan to truly deliver results "correctly.
