Even when summarized by AI, it remains in the "candidate selection" structure. We will establish a "winning model for agricultural web" that does not confuse you with the introduction environment or costs.
"Although there is a website, inquiries are not increasing" — the cause lies not in the amount of information, but in "insufficient structural design." With the spread of generative AI and AI search, users do not read pages thoroughly; instead, they narrow down their options based on the results of "adaptability and cost comparison" provided by AI. Websites that are not structured quietly fall out of the comparison arena, even if they have excellent technology. This service redesigns the web structure to communicate effectively to both AI and humans, taking into account the sales realities, regional characteristics, and decision-making processes in the agricultural field. It supports determining "which information to present, in what order, and how to make it resonate with the field." ■ Provided Content (3 points) - Organization of field, products, and decision-making (adaptable crops/selection criteria/cost recovery logic) - Redesign of information structure and pathways (region/crop-specific entry → in-depth technology exploration → CTA) - Creation of key page outlines (headline structure, appeal axes, placement of case studies/FAQs) Deliverables: Redesign report (To-Be structure) + sitemap + key page outlines + improvement roadmap Scope: Focused on designing key pages (top + product groups + case studies + document downloads, etc.) with production handled separately. *Please first share the current URL and products. We will organize the current "structural defects" and provide guidance on the redesign.
Inquire About This Product
basic information
【Features】 - Organization of business, field, and customers: We organize the "winning strategies" in the field, including adaptive crops, cultivation environments, and the logic for recovering implementation costs (ROI). - Redesign of information structure and pathways: We design the optimal route that leads from entry points based on region, crops, and challenges to in-depth technology exploration, demos, and consultations (CTA). - Creation of key page outlines: We arrange a headline structure that is easy for AI to summarize and provides a sense of understanding for humans, along with persuasive "case studies and FAQs." - Translation of on-site realities: We analyze the factors leading to lost opportunities by understanding "where producers and corporate decision-makers hesitate and why they decide to pass," and we formalize the responses for the web. - Structuring of content: We format agricultural-specific selection criteria, such as adaptive conditions, subsidy utilization, and compatibility with peripheral equipment, so that AI can accurately extract them. 【Our Strengths】 "A site that does not reach the field ends up being a 'cost' rather than an investment." We elevate the gritty sales realities of the agricultural field into a web structure using the latest technologies of the AI era. While thoroughly addressing standard requirements, we propose a "self-sustaining website" that is not influenced by subsidies or seasons, as professionals in production.
Price information
Light: 300,000 yen (Current situation analysis + overall policy + focus on Quick Wins) Standard: 600,000 yen (To-Be structure + sitemap + main page outline) Expanded: 1,000,000 yen and up (many product groups / competitive comparison / integration of multiple businesses, etc.) *Can be changed to require a quotation.
Delivery Time
※Minimum 2 weeks / Standard 3 to 5 weeks (depending on the scale)
Applications/Examples of results
Concerns like these: - The strengths of AI summarization misalign with "which crops and environments are optimal" and appear to be generalizations. - While case studies and achievements are presented, they do not match the "conditions" of producers who are considering options. - There are requests for materials, but the regions and scales do not align, leading to a lack of business negotiations (contracts). - There is consideration for a renewal, but there is uncertainty about designing in accordance with seasons and subsidy responses. - The persuasive power of on-site demonstrations and sales explanations does not align with the website. ■ Purpose - Confirming the "type that resonates on-site" before renewal. - Rebuilding the causes of reduced inquiries from the perspective of "regional and crop-specific pathways." - Mass production of product and crop-specific pages, and designing starting points for demo and trial pathways. - Redesigning to integrate the fragmentation of sales materials, web, and subsidy responses. ■ Examples of Achievements (Confidentiality Consideration Format) Industrial equipment × 200 employees × lost opportunities due to comparison × redesign of product page selection criteria and FAQs + pathway renewal. Precision machining × 80 employees × reduced inquiries × top definition statement + case placement + material download → redesign of consultation pathways. Chemical materials × 500 employees × fragmentation across multiple businesses × structural design for site integration + redefinition of page roles.
catalog（20）
Download All Catalogs
Company information
A site that is just cheap ultimately increases costs and risks." We propose web development that maximizes business results while thoroughly addressing essential requirements. Are you creating a website like this? - It seems that the websites of competitors look better, but you don't know why. - Every update incurs additional costs, and before you know it, expenses have ballooned beyond expectations. - While the appearance is nice, it ignores laws and industry-specific rules, leading to complaint risks... - You want to attract customers and inquiries, but the production company only talks about design. - As a result of choosing a production that is simply cheap, you are overwhelmed with trouble handling and can't focus on your core business. Point 1. Avoid troubles with a design that has no "gaps or omissions." 2. Minimize operational costs with a design that assumes in-house updates. 3. Planning power that pursues business results. "Is the initial cost a bit high?" But in the long run, it's safe and cost-effective. We have prepared a plan to truly deliver results "correctly.