We will identify the structural differences between companies that are "referenced by AI" and those that are "eliminated from consideration."
The reason why the web for manufacturing does not "work despite being created" lies not in the amount of information but in its "structure." In the era of AI search and generative AI summarization, the way sites are read changes, and companies whose strengths are not accurately recognized will quietly be removed from consideration. This GEO diagnosis inspects your site on the premise that AI will evaluate, summarize, and compare it, visualizing the causes of any losses with prioritized insights. ■ Provided Content (3 points) - Structural check of AI evaluation criteria (definitions, headings, information layout, FAQs, internal navigation) - Extraction of improvement points by important pages (top, products, case studies, document downloads, etc.) - Improvement priorities arranged by impact and effort (Quick Wins / Medium-term design) Deliverables: GEO diagnosis report (list of issues, priorities, improvement instructions) + next action proposals Scope / Premise: The target URL is generally limited to "up to 10 main pages" (exceeding this can be accommodated with an extension). *Please send us the URL first. We will provide an initial assessment (where the issues lie) and the scope of the diagnosis.
Inquire About This Product
basic information
■Concerns Decreased inquiries compared to before / Feeling that we are not being chosen in comparisons AI summaries misrepresent strengths, and the value of the product is not conveyed Discussions on improvements are stalled, and we cannot decide "where to start fixing" SEO measures are in place, but they do not lead to business negotiations Products, case studies, and materials are scattered, and sales activities do not align with the web ■Provided Content Alignment check of "company definition," "value offered," and "usage/selection criteria" as picked up by AI Extraction of points for organizing heading structure, summary resilience, and duplication/dispersal Connection point check between internal navigation (deep dive pathways) and decision-making pathways (material downloads/inquiries) Structural check as the "foundation for AI responses" for FAQs, case studies, and product information ■Deliverables GEO diagnosis report (conclusion summary + list of issues) Improvement priority list (Impact × man-hours) Improvement instructions by major page (what to fix and how) Quick Wins (immediate actions) / Mid-term design (framework for redesign) ■Approach Preliminary hearing (current situation, products, winning strategies, sales field) Diagnosis (structure, pathways, AI reference perspective check) Report delivery Presentation meeting (60 minutes) + organization of next actions (which is the shortest: improvements/design/support)
Price information
Light: 150,000 yen (Focus on main pages and Quick Wins) Standard: 300,000 yen (Main 10 pages + priority design) Expanded: 500,000 yen and up (Broader scope / Competitive comparison / Document structure) *Can also change to require a quote.
Delivery Time
※Minimum 10 business days / Standard 2 to 3 weeks
Applications/Examples of results
■Purpose Identifying the causes of reduced inquiries / Determining improvement priorities in the AI search era Judging the necessity of renewal (if doing it, confirming "where to start") Creating a starting point for reconnecting the sales flow (document downloads, case studies, forms) ■Examples of Achievements Precision machining × 80 employees × losing in comparisons × Redesigning selection criteria for product pages and FAQs Industrial equipment × 200 employees × decrease in inquiries × Redefining top definitions + redesigning navigation flow Chemical materials × 500 employees × document downloads exist but do not lead to negotiations × Redesigning the flow from documents to consultations
Company information
A site that is just cheap ultimately increases costs and risks." We propose web development that maximizes business results while thoroughly addressing essential requirements. Are you creating a website like this? - It seems that the websites of competitors look better, but you don't know why. - Every update incurs additional costs, and before you know it, expenses have ballooned beyond expectations. - While the appearance is nice, it ignores laws and industry-specific rules, leading to complaint risks... - You want to attract customers and inquiries, but the production company only talks about design. - As a result of choosing a production that is simply cheap, you are overwhelmed with trouble handling and can't focus on your core business. Point 1. Avoid troubles with a design that has no "gaps or omissions." 2. Minimize operational costs with a design that assumes in-house updates. 3. Planning power that pursues business results. "Is the initial cost a bit high?" But in the long run, it's safe and cost-effective. We have prepared a plan to truly deliver results "correctly.
