27. Wire design chosen based on technical comparison

Companies that do not lose in comparison charts are already winning before the comparison chart. We design the "criteria" for technical comparisons and create a pathway for selection.

Losses in B2B manufacturing occur not due to a lack of technical capability, but because the competitor holds the "arena for comparison." During the comparison stage, users narrow down their options not only based on specifications, price, and delivery time, but also by checking whether there will be "no failures," "operational feasibility," "stable supply," and "adequate guarantees." However, many sites fail to present criteria for comparison, ultimately leading to comparisons based on the competitor's standards and resulting in a price competition. Our service designs comparison criteria where your company can win (such as quality, structure, compatibility, risk reduction, etc.) and addresses common questions (objections) that arise during the comparison process, creating a situation where the judgment is not "this company is safe" but "this company is optimal." ▼ For concerns like these: - Price competition during comparisons leaves no profit. - Despite having technology, losing to competitors in a "safe" manner. - In competitive quotes, it ultimately turns into a discount battle. - Decision-makers say, "I don't really understand, so I'll go with the cheaper option." - Salespeople struggle to explain comparisons verbally each time (leading to dependency on individuals). *Please share the current URL and the "reasons for losing in competitive comparisons (assumptions are fine)." We will address the structural weaknesses in your comparisons.

others