東海ソフト Product Lineup

We would like to introduce a case study where our "PlusFORCE Manufacturing Execution/Warehouse Management" system was implemented at a parts manufacturer with sales of 15 billion yen. The company needed to focus on human-centered operations (performance management, operational management, work transportation, etc.) and required initiatives towards labor reduction. After implementation, information management through production management systems and equipment integration was automated, achieving a reduction in labor hours and improved accuracy. Additionally, they were able to grasp all work-in-progress inventory information between processes, enabling optimal inventory management at all times. 【Case Overview】 ■Before - Required a significant amount of management labor for manual performance input and progress management. - Managed flat stock inventory manually, and transportation was operated using a labor-intensive approach. ■After - Automated information management through production management systems and equipment integration, resulting in reduced labor hours and improved accuracy. - Achieved optimal inventory management at all times, with inter-process transportation automated by AMR. *For more details, please download the PDF or feel free to contact us.

We would like to introduce a case study where our "PlusFORCE Manufacturing Execution" was implemented at a process manufacturing company with sales of 400 billion yen. The company faced challenges in collecting and managing work performance data on paper, as well as wanting to understand the manufacturing operations that were left to the site. After the implementation, it became possible to confirm work performance on the system by production instruction units, allowing for inquiries, investigations, and the extraction of issues and improvement points from the production management system. [Case Overview] ■Before - Work performance information was recorded manually (on paper) and then re-entered into Excel for management. ■After - Elimination of input on paper achieved a paperless environment. *For more details, please download the PDF or feel free to contact us.

We would like to introduce a case study where our "PlusFORCE Manufacturing Execution" system was implemented at a food manufacturer with sales of 500 billion yen. In the company's current factory, manual operations were the main focus in the manufacturing process, leading to a high level of worker involvement, and both manufacturing plans and actual results were managed on paper, resulting in poor work efficiency. After the implementation, planning, instructions, operation monitoring, and actual results in the manufacturing process could be centrally managed. 【Case Overview】 ■Before - Workers were constantly operating and monitoring equipment on-site. - Managers were handwriting plans on a whiteboard. ■After - With the automation control via PLC, it was no longer necessary for workers to be on-site constantly (they only needed to respond when alerts were triggered). *For more details, please download the PDF or feel free to contact us.

We would like to introduce a case study of our "PlusFORCE Warehouse Management" system implemented at a logistics subsidiary of an industrial machinery manufacturer with sales of 30 billion yen. The vendor of the existing system could not customize it to fit the operations, and the company was unable to implement a system that matched its needs. Therefore, we proposed a warehouse management system that could maximize the use of the existing system and allow for phased implementation. It became possible to easily identify the locations of inventory, and inventory counts could be conducted using the system. 【Case Overview】 ■Before - While the coordinates of inventory locations were known, it was not immediately clear where the locations were, and inventory counts were done manually. ■After - Inventory locations became easily identifiable, and inventory counts were conducted using the system. *For more details, please download the PDF or feel free to contact us.

We would like to introduce a case where our "PlusFORCE Manufacturing Execution" system was implemented at a machinery manufacturer with approximately 500 billion yen in sales. At the start of the implementation, we proposed and executed a management system for the status of materials (sorting, delivery, receipt) by registering them, which was the biggest challenge at that time, along with monitoring the stagnation between processes. We proposed a system based on the areas that needed improvement, considering the scalability of integration with equipment and systems. By collecting, visualizing, and sharing information from the field, we promoted efficiency and improvements in on-site management. 【Case Overview】 ■ Customer Challenges - There was no system implemented on-site, making it impossible to understand real-time process progress. Management was done using paper and Excel, leading to poor work efficiency and difficulties in making improvements. ■ Customer Comments - By systematizing the confirmation of process progress that was previously done via phone and other means, we were able to visualize the process and actual performance, resulting in increased work efficiency. *For more details, please download the PDF or feel free to contact us.

We would like to introduce a case study where our "FlexSignal" and the optional Alarm were implemented at an automotive parts manufacturer with sales of 3 billion yen. The company was experiencing fluctuations in production volume due to a lack of understanding of operational status and factors causing downtime. To secure the planned production numbers, they were relying on overtime and holiday work, which led to worker fatigue and turnover issues. In response, we proposed "FlexSignal" as a common information interface to collect data of the same granularity from both new and old equipment, focusing on understanding operational rates. By grasping the operational status, including factors causing downtime, improvement activities became more active. 【Case Overview】 ■Before - Unable to grasp operational status, leading to a lack of production control. ■After - Increased production efficiency through active improvement activities driven by understanding the factors causing downtime. *For more details, please download the PDF or feel free to contact us.

We would like to introduce a case where our "FlexSignal" and options (Alarm, Pro, Camera) were implemented at a comprehensive stationery manufacturer with sales of 50 billion yen. The company faced challenges in obtaining data on the operation and stoppage of production equipment as desired. Therefore, we proposed the introduction of "AirGRID + FlexSignal" to establish a system for accurate operational data and effective improvement activities. This enabled rapid and precise improvements. 【Features】 ■Before - Data recorded in daily reports was compiled in Excel and checked on a weekly or monthly basis. - Even if there were issues with the equipment, they were not able to respond quickly. ■After - At the end of each workday, data is checked to understand what abnormalities occurred. - Repairs and improvements can now be made by the next operating day. *For more details, please download the PDF or feel free to contact us.