シーオス Company Overview

Are you struggling with the fact that even after raising recruitment costs and hourly wages, on-site personnel are not sticking around? The true causes of turnover lie in "fatigue from heavy labor" and "discomfort in the work environment." However, improving the entire facility or fully automating operations involves enormous initial investments and is not realistic. In this seminar, we will reveal three practical solutions to create a "preferred workplace" based on a case study that reduced investment costs by approximately 20% compared to traditional proposals, without relying on expensive renovations or endless wage increases. The key lies in the integrated design of "construction and equipment" and "robotics." By thoroughly eliminating unnecessary capital investments, we can dramatically reduce the burden on the workforce and enhance productivity. As a company that also engages in outsourcing, we will thoroughly explain the "three principles" that support integrated design, using actual improvement cases. This content is a must-see for executives and site managers who want to fundamentally solve labor shortages within their budgets. [Recommended for] - Companies that continue to face turnover and recruitment difficulties despite raising wages and recruitment costs. - Site managers and executives who considered full building air conditioning or complete automation but abandoned the idea due to high costs. - Site managers and executives who want to balance investment restraint and productivity improvement through relocation or renovations.

[All 3 Sessions] A detailed explanation of key points to prevent failures, from considering system renewal to partner selection, divided into three parts. Even though the same RFP was issued, the proposed amounts from each company can vary significantly. In such cases, it’s tempting to choose the "cheapest company" based solely on the total amount. However, a seemingly low proposal may not include all the necessary work. What’s important in proposal comparison is to interpret the exclusions, assumptions, and the range of confirmed amounts, and to realign them on the same playing field. When considering not just the initial costs but also the operational expenses, the meaning of the price differences changes. In this seminar, we will explain how to read proposals from the end rather than from the total amount, the steps to realign estimates, comparisons based on the total amount that includes both initial and operational costs, evaluation criteria beyond just price such as the range of confirmations, communications leading to proposals, and the structure, as well as how to ensure everything is in a form that can be redone before the contract, based on model cases. [Recommended for] - Those who want to explain the differences in proposal amounts - Those who want to leave a record of selection reasons that can be explained internally [Speaker] C.O.S. Co., Ltd. Director, CCSO (Chief Consulting Officer) Head of Technology Services Division Yoshinori Imai

【All 3 Sessions】 A detailed explanation of key points to prevent failures, from considering system renewal to selecting partners, divided into three parts. When a budget for logistics system renewal is allocated, numerous requests come in from various locations, headquarters, and the information systems department. Each request seems valid from the perspective of the field, and it is difficult for anyone to say "unnecessary," so if we proceed without criteria, everything becomes a Must. However, simply listing the requests in the RFP will not yield comparable proposals from vendors. What is needed is not to dismiss the voices from the field, but to transform them into requirements by attaching impacts, purposes, and goals, and to decide what will and will not be done this time. In this seminar, we will specifically explain the differences between requests and requirements, the criteria for Must/Should/Could, the destination of dropped requests, the content that should be included in the RFP, and how to disclose evaluation criteria in advance to enable comparison, based on a model case. 【Recommended for】 - Those who have too many field requests and cannot narrow them down - Those struggling with organizing requirements before creating an RFP - Those who want to avoid everything becoming a Must and receive comparable proposals 【Speaker】 Yoshinori Imai Director Head of Technology Services Division C.O.S. Corporation