Introduction to Paperlogic > Internal Signature Function

The method of signing electronic contracts (party type and witness type) is directly linked to the strength of their legal effectiveness. In this article, we will outline the reasons why the more stringent "party type" has been difficult to popularize until now. ---【Conclusion of this article】-------------------------------- • There are two methods of signing electronic contracts: "witness type" and "party type," which differ in the strictness of identity verification. • The main reasons why the party type has not spread are the three factors of "effort, cost, and structural risks associated with entrusting the private key." • However, currently, with the spread of public personal authentication using My Number cards (JPKI), these three barriers are beginning to crumble. -------------------------------------------------------- The full text of the article can be accessed via the "Related Links."

We will be exhibiting at the "Business Solution Fair 2026 Autumn in Omiya," which will be held at Omiya Sonic City on September 8 (Tuesday) and September 9 (Wednesday). This event is organized by Otsuka Corporation and is an opportunity to encounter new IT solutions. Under the theme "Expanding with AI! Complete DX," we will introduce DX solutions that accelerate your business through seminars (including hands-on seminars) and exhibitions. You will be able to experience various services from different companies. We look forward to seeing you at the venue!

We will explain the legal obligations of the "recipient" in electronic contracts that cannot be ignored, the risks of "leaving it unattended" from tax and legal perspectives, and provide a practical storage manual that can be used immediately. ---Content of the article here-------------------------------- [Part 1] ■ The biggest trap is thinking "it doesn't matter because our company hasn't implemented it." The obligation to store electronic records applies 100% to the recipient as well. ■ Is it legal to "leave it unattended" in the other party's system? Interpreting the latest views from the National Tax Agency. ■ The three major risks of "leaving it unattended" from the perspectives of legal affairs and internal controls. ■ What requirements must the recipient clear? [Part 2] ■ A review of the "two major requirements" of the electronic record law that the recipient must clear. ■ Reducing the burden on the field! A specific storage and operation manual for the "recipient." ■ The true solution is the integration and centralized management of "third-party system contracts." ■ Utilizing paperlogic for "ultimate automation and centralized management." ■ Even as the "receiving side," it is necessary to maintain control over electronic transactions! -------------------------------------------------------- The full text of the article can be accessed from the "related links."

This time, I will explain the "another preservation deadline" hidden behind the numbers of the Electronic Bookkeeping Act and the "technical lifespan" unique to electronic contracts. ---Content of the article here-------------------------------- ■Differences in preservation periods for tax and legal purposes ■Contract cases that require long-term preservation of over 10 years 　●In the construction and building industry 　●In the manufacturing industry 　●In the case of ongoing long-term contracts ■Risks unique to electronic contracts: "Validity period of electronic signatures" ■Long-term preservation solutions (paperlogic) ■Summary: Building a long-term preservation system to protect corporate rights -------------------------------------------------------- The full text of the article can be accessed from the "Related Links."