Simply creating something is not enough to achieve results. In the AI era, we will build a "chosen structure" by making monthly improvements.
GEO (Structure Optimization Referenced by AI) is not a one-time task that is completed once it is set up. The search intent, competition, AI reference trends, and internal product information are constantly changing. If you cannot keep up with these changes, the structure you thought was organized will quickly collapse, and the issue of candidates falling out during comparisons will reoccur. This service provides ongoing support tailored to the practical needs of B2B manufacturing, cycling through "Prioritization → Improvement → Verification" every month to continuously update the structure that leads to inquiries and business negotiations. It increases the "frequency of improvements," which tends to stagnate within the company, and maintains a state where results are achieved. ■ Provided Content (3 Points) Monthly Priority Design (Determining what needs to be done this month based on Impact × Workload) Improvement Execution Support (Structure rewriting / FAQ expansion / Pathway and CTA improvements / Case study development) Verification and Next Steps (Observing responses and connecting to next month's improvement themes) Deliverables: Monthly Improvement Report (Implementation details, effects, next month's plan) + Improvement drafts/instructions Scope/Assumptions: Monthly regular meetings (60–90 minutes) + improvement tasks (scope adjusted based on the plan) *Please share the current URL and issues (such as reduced inquiries, losing comparisons, etc.). We will design the "most effective order of improvements" in the first month.
Inquire About This Product
basic information
■Provided Content (Details) Monthly Improvement Cycle (Example) Analysis: Check for bottlenecks in search entry, navigation, and comparison (refer to GA/GSC if possible) Priority: Narrow down to "winning strategies for this month" based on Impact × Effort Improvements: - Rewrite information structure (AI summarization support) - Structure and expand FAQ (foundation for AI responses) - Organize case study pages (showing reproducibility) - Improve CTAs (consultation permission type, step-by-step CTAs) - Design navigation (deep links, related page design) - Add and improve challenge LP (GEO) Verification: Update hypotheses for the next month based on changes in responses (quality of inquiries, stay duration, navigation, downloads, etc.) ■Value of Partnership (Difference from In-house Operations) "Tasks" are clarified every month and do not stop Improvements become templated, ensuring consistent quality Necessary decision-making materials for comparison (FAQ/case studies/documents) increase Measures align with web, sales, and documents, reducing inconsistencies ■Deliverables Monthly improvement plan (priorities for this month, target pages, tasks) Improvement drafts/instruction documents (heading structure, differences, CTAs, pathways) Monthly report (implementation details, impressions, improvement themes for next month) Updates to templates/operational rules (the more it continues, the stronger the framework becomes)
Price information
Light: 150,000 yen per month (regular meetings + priority design + improvement instructions focus) Standard: 300,000 yen per month (regular meetings + actual improvement work (draft/design) + monthly report) Expanded: 500,000 yen per month and up (expanding the scope of execution such as page expansion/case production/DB maintenance) *There may be an initial kickoff (separately) to be set (estimate required)
Delivery Time
※Monthly operation (continuation) / Implement Quick Win in the first month
Applications/Examples of results
■Concerns I tried GEO, but ultimately I don't know what the correct answer is, so I stopped. There are various initiatives, and priorities cannot be determined within the company. I have increased the number of pages, but inquiries and business negotiations are not increasing. I cannot organize case studies, FAQs, and materials, and I am losing in comparisons. The operations staff are busy, and improvements cannot be sustained. ■Approach Initial sharing: URL/Product/Issues/System (possibility of updates) First month: Current situation diagnosis + Improvement roadmap formulation + Quick Win implementation Monthly: Regular meetings (priority confirmation) → Improvements → Verification → Next month's plan Quarterly: Results review (fixing winning patterns and determining the scope of expansion) ■Uses Continuous improvement of GEO (continuing to win through AI summarization and comparisons) Raising the level of inquiries and business negotiations (continuing countermeasures for comparative consideration) Expansion of case studies, FAQs, and issue LPs (accumulation of decision-making materials) Systematization of internal operations (updating templates/regulations) ■Examples of achievements (confidentiality consideration format) Precision machining × 80 employees × stagnation of inquiries × monthly expansion of FAQs/case studies/user flows to improve business negotiations. Industrial equipment × 200 employees × lost orders due to comparisons × monthly organization of comparison axes and decision-making materials to suppress candidate dropouts. Chemical materials × 500 employees × numerous product groups × standardization to unify page quality and continue improvements.
catalog（20）
Download All Catalogs
Company information
A site that is just cheap ultimately increases costs and risks." We propose web development that maximizes business results while thoroughly addressing essential requirements. Are you creating a website like this? - It seems that the websites of competitors look better, but you don't know why. - Every update incurs additional costs, and before you know it, expenses have ballooned beyond expectations. - While the appearance is nice, it ignores laws and industry-specific rules, leading to complaint risks... - You want to attract customers and inquiries, but the production company only talks about design. - As a result of choosing a production that is simply cheap, you are overwhelmed with trouble handling and can't focus on your core business. Point 1. Avoid troubles with a design that has no "gaps or omissions." 2. Minimize operational costs with a design that assumes in-house updates. 3. Planning power that pursues business results. "Is the initial cost a bit high?" But in the long run, it's safe and cost-effective. We have prepared a plan to truly deliver results "correctly.
